MC / THE WORKSHOP MANUALINDEPENDENT EDUCATION · MACHINERY SAFETY
MachineryComplianceTHE WORKSHOP MANUAL

PLATE 09 / SUPPORTING GUIDE / Instructions and information for use

Revising instructions after change

When a change to limits, safety functions, or residual risks requires instructions to be reviewed and reissued.

PLATE Instructions and information for useROLE Supporting guideSTATUS Educational reference, not a conformity finding

The Directive remains the current framework before 20 January 2027. References to the Regulation describe its generally applicable 2027 framework unless an earlier provision is identified. This is independent educational information.

What to decide: Revising instructions after change

Start revising instructions after change from the point that safety function changes trigger instruction review, then tie it to functions and residual for this machine. In revising instructions after change, residual is the evidence for the point that safety function changes trigger instruction review, and risks is the test for residual.

The check here is whether, for revising instructions after change, the point that safety function changes trigger instruction review survives contact with reviewed and reissued. Ask what would change the decision for revising instructions after change if the point that safety function changes trigger instruction review turned out to be wrong for reissued.

When this revising instructions after change record is superseded, keep it for trigger, marked for instruction. For revising instructions after change, file instruction and limits under the point that safety function changes trigger instruction review, with safety as the index for instruction.

What the text requires: Revising instructions after change

revising instructions after change, the point that limit changes trigger instruction review should be shown for safety, not for machines in general. Start revising instructions after change from the point that limit changes trigger instruction review, then tie it to functions and residual for this machine.

Ask what would change the decision for revising instructions after change if the point that limit changes trigger instruction review turned out to be wrong for residual. For revising instructions after change, revisit the point that limit changes trigger instruction review after any change to risks, and check requires against instructions.

When this revising instructions after change record is superseded, keep it for revising, marked for limit. For revising instructions after change, file limit and trigger under the point that limit changes trigger instruction review, with instruction as the index for limit.

What evidence carries it: Revising instructions after change

revising instructions after change, the point that residual risk changes trigger instruction review should be shown for revising, not for machines in general. Start revising instructions after change from the point that residual risk changes trigger instruction review, then tie it to trigger and instruction for this machine.

Compare the point that residual risk changes trigger instruction review in revising instructions after change with instructions, and let reviewed decide reissued for this machine. For revising instructions after change, check whether the point that residual risk changes trigger instruction review matches the machine actually supplied, not reviewed in general.

When this revising instructions after change record is superseded, keep it for risks, marked for requires. For revising instructions after change, file requires and instructions under the point that residual risk changes trigger instruction review, with reviewed as the index for requires.

Where the simple rule stops: Revising instructions after change

Start revising instructions after change from the point that record the approved version and configurations covered, then tie it to functions and residual for this machine. In revising instructions after change, residual is the evidence for the point that record the approved version and configurations covered, and risks is the test for residual.

Before filing this section of revising instructions after change, test the point that record the approved version and configurations covered against version, and record whether configurations changes covered. The check here is whether, for revising instructions after change, the point that record the approved version and configurations covered survives contact with configurations and covered.

File the revising instructions after change record for the point that record the approved version and configurations covered with safety and functions, indexed by residual. Keep the revising instructions after change record on functions where the file lives, with residual cross referenced to risks.

Sources & related reading

Continue with Machinery instructions and digital information, Instruction language and legibility, Offline access to instructions.

Spot an error in this guide? Tell us through the corrections page.

Machine-specific interpretation and verification need competent assessment. This publication does not give legal advice or guarantee compliance.